DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Nissan Cedric vs 2011 Opel Vivaro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

49.25–48.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeOpel
CedricModelVivaro
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats9
4Doors4

Performance

18,4 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
157 km/hTop speed145 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
85 HPPower90 HP
170 NmTorque230 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank0 lt
12 ltUrban consumption9,8 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6 Techshift
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4782 mm
1695 mmWidth1904 mm
1445 mmHeight1959 mm
1480 KgWeight1960 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase3098 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Nissan Cedric and 2011 Opel Vivaro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…