DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Opel Combo vs 2011 Nissan Cedric Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–49.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

OpelMakeNissan
ComboModelCedric
2011Model year2011
MinivanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

14,0 s0–100 km/h18,4 s
164 km/hTop speed157 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
87 HPPower85 HP
138 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol / LPG
52 ltFuel tank0 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption12 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption8,3 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption11,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears4
175/65 R14Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4320 mmLength4690 mm
1685 mmWidth1695 mm
1800 mmHeight1445 mm
1210 KgWeight1480 Kg
2715 mmWheelbase2735 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Opel Combo and 2011 Nissan Cedric approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…