DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2011 Nissan Cedric vs 2011 Opel Combo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Combo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

49.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeOpel
CedricModelCombo
2011Model year2011
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

18,4 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
157 km/hTop speed164 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
85 HPPower87 HP
170 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank52 lt
12 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size175/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4320 mm
1695 mmWidth1685 mm
1445 mmHeight1800 mm
1480 KgWeight1210 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2715 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2011 Nissan Cedric and 2011 Opel Combo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Combo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…