DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Nissan Cedric vs 2004 Opel Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeOpel
CedricModelAstra
2004Model year2004
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

18,4 s0–100 km/h14,5 s
157 km/hTop speed171 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
85 HPPower85 HP
170 NmTorque138 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank52 lt
12 ltUrban consumption11,3 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4110 mm
1695 mmWidth1709 mm
1445 mmHeight1425 mm
1480 KgWeight1083 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2606 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Nissan Cedric and 2004 Opel Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…