DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Cedric vs 2003 Hyundai Galloper Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Cedric

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

46.25–45.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeHyundai
CedricModelGalloper
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors3

Performance

18,4 s0–100 km/h19,3 s
157 km/hTop speed136 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2476 cc
85 HPPower99 HP
170 NmTorque225 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank75 lt
12 ltUrban consumption13,9 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size235/75 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4085 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1445 mmHeight1840 mm
1480 KgWeight1745 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2350 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Cedric and 2003 Hyundai Galloper approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Cedric leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…