DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Cedric vs 2003 GAZ 31 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

GAZ 31

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

46.25–46.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan CedricSpecificationGAZ 31
NissanMakeGAZ
CedricModel31
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Nissan CedricSpecificationGAZ 31
18,4 s0–100 km/h19,0 s
157 km/hTop speed147 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2445 cc
85 HPPower100 HP
170 NmTorque182 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan CedricSpecificationGAZ 31
Petrol / LPGFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank70 lt
12 ltUrban consumption13 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
11,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan CedricSpecificationGAZ 31
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R15

Dimensions

Nissan CedricSpecificationGAZ 31
4690 mmLength4870 mm
1695 mmWidth1800 mm
1445 mmHeight1422 mm
1480 KgWeight1400 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2800 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Cedric and 2003 GAZ 31 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, GAZ 31 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…