DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Cedric vs 2003 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen Xsara

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–47.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeCitroen
CedricModelXsara
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

18,4 s0–100 km/h13,1 s
157 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
85 HPPower90 HP
170 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Petrol / LPGFuel typePetrol
0 ltFuel tank54 lt
12 ltUrban consumption11 lt
8,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
11,1 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
195/65 R15Tyre size185/65 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4690 mmLength4167 mm
1695 mmWidth1698 mm
1445 mmHeight1405 mm
1480 KgWeight1020 Kg
2735 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Cedric and 2003 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen Xsara leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…