DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Nissan Bluebird vs 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Oldsmobile Cutlass

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeOldsmobile
BluebirdModelCutlass
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
4Doors2

Performance

0 km/hTop speed190 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement2260 cc
211 HPPower162 HP
275 NmTorque210 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption16 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears3
—Tyre size195/75 R14 S
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4585 mmLength4900 mm
1695 mmWidth1805 mm
1405 mmHeight1350 mm
—Weight1445 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2730 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Nissan Bluebird and 1996 Oldsmobile Cutlass approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Oldsmobile Cutlass leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…