DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Mitsubishi Lancer vs 1996 Nissan Bluebird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

66.5–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeNissan
LancerModelBluebird
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
270 HPPower211 HP
0 NmTorque275 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/60 R15Tyre size—

Dimensions

4310 mmLength4585 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1420 mmHeight1405 mm
1260 KgWeight—
2510 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Mitsubishi Lancer and 1996 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…