2002 • Nissan
Bluebird
Nissan Bluebird 2.0i (150 Hp) 2002Overall Score65.5/100
2002 Nissan Bluebird vs 2002 Ford Mondeo Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2002 • Ford
Mondeo
Ford Mondeo 2.0 TDCi (130 Hp) 2002Overall Score64.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Bluebird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
65.5–64.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationFord Mondeo
NissanMakeFord
BluebirdModelMondeo
2002Model year2002
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationFord Mondeo
9,2 s0–100 km/h9,8 s
201 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
150 HPPower130 HP
200 NmTorque330 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationFord Mondeo
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank56 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
6,4 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationFord Mondeo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
1 CVTGears6
185/65 R15Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationFord Mondeo
4470 mmLength4731 mm
1695 mmWidth1812 mm
1445 mmHeight1429 mm
1220 KgWeight1460 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2754 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2002 Nissan Bluebird and 2002 Ford Mondeo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…