DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Alfa Romeo 147 vs 2002 Nissan Bluebird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

64.75–65.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alfa RomeoMakeNissan
147ModelBluebird
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3Doors4

Performance

9,1 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
206 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1910 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
140 HPPower150 HP
305 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
8 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption8,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears1 CVT
195/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4170 mmLength4470 mm
1729 mmWidth1695 mm
1439 mmHeight1445 mm
1275 KgWeight1220 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Alfa Romeo 147 and 2002 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…