2000 • Nissan
Bluebird
Nissan Bluebird 1.8i (115 Hp) 2000Overall Score54.25/100
2000 Nissan Bluebird vs 2000 Ford Focus Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Ford
Focus
Ford Focus 1.8 Turbo DI (90 Hp) 2000Overall Score53.25/100
WINNER
Nissan Bluebird
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationFord Focus
NissanMakeFord
BluebirdModelFocus
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationFord Focus
12,2 s0–100 km/h12,4 s
180 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1753 cc
115 HPPower90 HP
163 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationFord Focus
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank53 lt
9,5 ltUrban consumption6,7 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption3,9 lt
8,8 ltAverage consumption5,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationFord Focus
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan BluebirdSpecificationFord Focus
4470 mmLength4152 mm
1695 mmWidth1698 mm
1475 mmHeight1430 mm
1270 KgWeight1183 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2615 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Nissan Bluebird and 2000 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…