DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Nissan Bluebird vs 2012 Mini Countryman Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

54.25–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMini
BluebirdModelCountryman
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeHatchback
5Seats4/5
4Doors5

Performance

13,0 s0–100 km/h11,9 s
183 km/hTop speed173 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
109 HPPower98 HP
148 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank47 lt
8,5 ltUrban consumption7,4 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption6,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
185/65 R15Tyre size205/60 R16 92H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4610 mmLength4097 mm
1695 mmWidth1789 mm
1510 mmHeight1561 mm
1250 KgWeight1265 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2595 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Nissan Bluebird and 2012 Mini Countryman approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…