DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Mini Countryman vs 2012 Nissan Bluebird Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Bluebird

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

53.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MiniMakeNissan
CountrymanModelBluebird
2012Model year2012
HatchbackBody typeSedan
4/5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,9 s0–100 km/h13,0 s
173 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
98 HPPower109 HP
153 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank52 lt
7,4 ltUrban consumption8,5 lt
5,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
6,0 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears4
205/60 R16 92HTyre size185/65 R15
YesABS—

Dimensions

4097 mmLength4610 mm
1789 mmWidth1695 mm
1561 mmHeight1510 mm
1265 KgWeight1250 Kg
2595 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Mini Countryman and 2012 Nissan Bluebird approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Bluebird leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…