2012 • Nissan
Armada
Nissan Armada 5.6 (317 Hp) 2012Overall Score76.5/100
2012 Nissan Armada vs 2012 Chrysler 300 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Chrysler
300
Chrysler 300 5.7 (363 Hp) 2012Overall Score75.75/100
WINNER
Nissan Armada
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
76.5–75.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan ArmadaSpecificationChrysler 300
NissanMakeChrysler
ArmadaModel300
2012Model year2012
Off-road vehicleBody typeSedan
7Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Nissan ArmadaSpecificationChrysler 300
7,1 s0–100 km/h5,4 s
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
5552 ccEngine displacement5654 cc
317 HPPower363 HP
385 NmTorque527 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan ArmadaSpecificationChrysler 300
PetrolFuel typePetrol
106 ltFuel tank72 lt
18,1 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
13,1 ltExtra-urban consumption9,4 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan ArmadaSpecificationChrysler 300
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size215/65 R17
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan ArmadaSpecificationChrysler 300
5255 mmLength5066 mm
2002 mmWidth1902 mm
1913 mmHeight1462 mm
2480 KgWeight1937 Kg
3130 mmWheelbase3052 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Nissan Armada and 2012 Chrysler 300 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
Comments are loading…