2012 • Chrysler
300
Chrysler 300 5.7 (363 Hp) 2012Overall Score75.75/100
2012 Chrysler 300 vs 2012 Nissan Armada Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2012 • Nissan
Armada
Nissan Armada 5.6 (317 Hp) 2012Overall Score76.5/100
WINNER
Nissan Armada
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
75.75–76.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Chrysler 300SpecificationNissan Armada
ChryslerMakeNissan
300ModelArmada
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats7
4Doors5
Performance
Chrysler 300SpecificationNissan Armada
5,4 s0–100 km/h7,1 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
5654 ccEngine displacement5552 cc
363 HPPower317 HP
527 NmTorque385 Nm
8Cylinders8
Fuel & Consumption
Chrysler 300SpecificationNissan Armada
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank106 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption18,1 lt
9,4 ltExtra-urban consumption13,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Chrysler 300SpecificationNissan Armada
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/65 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—
Dimensions
Chrysler 300SpecificationNissan Armada
5066 mmLength5255 mm
1902 mmWidth2002 mm
1462 mmHeight1913 mm
1937 KgWeight2480 Kg
3052 mmWheelbase3130 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2012 Chrysler 300 and 2012 Nissan Armada approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan Armada leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
Comments are loading…