DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Almera vs 2000 Toyota Corolla Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Almera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

57.25–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeToyota
AlmeraModelCorolla
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement2184 cc
110 HPPower79 HP
230 NmTorque147 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
8 ltUrban consumption6,8 lt
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption6 lt
5,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size175/70 R14
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4425 mmLength4385 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1445 mmHeight1475 mm
1235 KgWeight1190 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Almera and 2000 Toyota Corolla approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Almera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…