DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Nissan Almera vs 2000 Mazda MX-6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Almera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeMazda
AlmeraModelMX-6
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2

Performance

12,3 s0–100 km/h10,4 s
185 km/hTop speed204 km/h
2184 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
110 HPPower115 HP
230 NmTorque170 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank60 lt
8 ltUrban consumption—
4,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,9 ltAverage consumption8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size195/65 R14 88 H
—ABSYes

Dimensions

4425 mmLength4615 mm
1695 mmWidth1750 mm
1445 mmHeight1310 mm
1235 KgWeight1120 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Nissan Almera and 2000 Mazda MX-6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Almera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…