DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan Almera vs 2003 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Almera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

54.25–53.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan AlmeraSpecificationMG ZS
NissanMakeMG
AlmeraModelZS
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

Nissan AlmeraSpecificationMG ZS
12,5 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
176 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
116 HPPower117 HP
163 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan AlmeraSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,6 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
7,8 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan AlmeraSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size205/45 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan AlmeraSpecificationMG ZS
4425 mmLength4520 mm
1695 mmWidth1700 mm
1445 mmHeight1390 mm
1186 KgWeight1125 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan Almera and 2003 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Almera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…