DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Nissan Almera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Almera

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.5–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationNissan Almera
MGMakeNissan
ZSModelAlmera
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationNissan Almera
9,0 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
19 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
117 HPPower116 HP
160 NmTorque163 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationNissan Almera
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption10,6 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption7,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationNissan Almera
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/45 R17Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationNissan Almera
4520 mmLength4425 mm
1700 mmWidth1695 mm
1390 mmHeight1445 mm
1125 KgWeight1186 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Nissan Almera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Almera leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…