DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Audi A6 vs 2012 Alpina B3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

90.5–91.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A6SpecificationAlpina B3
AudiMakeAlpina
A6ModelB3
2012Model year2012
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Audi A6SpecificationAlpina B3
5,6 s0–100 km/h4,9 s
250 km/hTop speed280 km/h
2995 ccEngine displacement2979 cc
310 HPPower360 HP
440 NmTorque500 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A6SpecificationAlpina B3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank63 lt
10,8 ltUrban consumption14,7 lt
6,6 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
8,2 ltAverage consumption10,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A6SpecificationAlpina B3
4x4Drivetrain4x4
7 S tronicGears6
225/55 R17Tyre size245/40 R18ZR; 265/40 R18ZR
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Audi A6SpecificationAlpina B3
4926 mmLength4545 mm
1874 mmWidth1817 mm
1468 mmHeight1422 mm
1865 KgWeight1645 Kg
2912 mmWheelbase2760 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Audi A6 and 2012 Alpina B3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…