DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2012 Alpina B3 vs 2012 Audi A6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Alpina B3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

91.5–90.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Alpina B3SpecificationAudi A6
AlpinaMakeAudi
B3ModelA6
2012Model year2012
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Alpina B3SpecificationAudi A6
4,9 s0–100 km/h5,6 s
280 km/hTop speed250 km/h
2979 ccEngine displacement2995 cc
360 HPPower310 HP
500 NmTorque440 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

Alpina B3SpecificationAudi A6
PetrolFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank65 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption10,8 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,6 lt
10,2 ltAverage consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Alpina B3SpecificationAudi A6
4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears7 S tronic
245/40 R18ZR; 265/40 R18ZRTyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Alpina B3SpecificationAudi A6
4545 mmLength4926 mm
1817 mmWidth1874 mm
1422 mmHeight1468 mm
1645 KgWeight1865 Kg
2760 mmWheelbase2912 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2012 Alpina B3 and 2012 Audi A6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Alpina B3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…