DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1996 Nissan AD vs 1996 Seat Toledo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Seat Toledo

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

51.5–52.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

NissanMakeSeat
ADModelToledo
1996Model year1996
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h12,7 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1974 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
76 HPPower90 HP
132 NmTorque202 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption5,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,3 lt
—Average consumption4,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R14

Dimensions

4175 mmLength4321 mm
1665 mmWidth1662 mm
1480 mmHeight1421 mm
—Weight1080 Kg
2400 mmWheelbase2471 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1996 Nissan AD and 1996 Seat Toledo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Seat Toledo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…