1996 • Seat
Toledo
Seat Toledo 1.9 TDI (90 Hp) 1996Overall Score52.25/100
1996 Seat Toledo vs 1996 Nissan AD Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1996 • Nissan
AD
Nissan AD 2.0d (76 Hp) 1996Overall Score51.5/100
WINNER
Seat Toledo
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
52.25–51.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Seat ToledoSpecificationNissan AD
SeatMakeNissan
ToledoModelAD
1996Model year1996
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Seat ToledoSpecificationNissan AD
12,7 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1896 ccEngine displacement1974 cc
90 HPPower76 HP
202 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Seat ToledoSpecificationNissan AD
DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
5,6 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,8 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Seat ToledoSpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/60 R14Tyre size—
Dimensions
Seat ToledoSpecificationNissan AD
4321 mmLength4175 mm
1662 mmWidth1665 mm
1421 mmHeight1480 mm
1080 KgWeight—
2471 mmWheelbase2400 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1996 Seat Toledo and 1996 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Seat Toledo leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…