DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan AD vs 2003 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi A3
NissanMakeAudi
ADModelA3
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi A3
—0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
122 HPPower115 HP
165 NmTorque155 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi A3
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi A3
4370 mmLength4203 mm
1695 mmWidth1765 mm
1475 mmHeight1421 mm
1130 KgWeight1225 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2578 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan AD and 2003 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…