DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Audi A3 vs 2003 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationNissan AD
AudiMakeNissan
A3ModelAD
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationNissan AD
10,9 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
115 HPPower122 HP
155 NmTorque165 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationNissan AD
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,7 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears5
205/55 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationNissan AD
4203 mmLength4370 mm
1765 mmWidth1695 mm
1421 mmHeight1475 mm
1225 KgWeight1130 Kg
2578 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Audi A3 and 2003 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…