DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Nissan AD vs 2010 Volvo C30 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo C30
NissanMakeVolvo
ADModelC30
2010Model year2010
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo C30
11,7 s0–100 km/h11,3 s
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
124 HPPower114 HP
173 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo C30
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank52 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption4,3 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,5 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo C30
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo C30
4395 mmLength4266 mm
1695 mmWidth1782 mm
1500 mmHeight1447 mm
1140 KgWeight1354 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Nissan AD and 2010 Volvo C30 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…