DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2010 Volvo C30 vs 2010 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Volvo C30SpecificationNissan AD
VolvoMakeNissan
C30ModelAD
2010Model year2010
CoupeBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

Volvo C30SpecificationNissan AD
11,3 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
0 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
114 HPPower124 HP
270 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Volvo C30SpecificationNissan AD
DieselFuel typePetrol
52 ltFuel tank41 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
3,8 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Volvo C30SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
YesABS—

Dimensions

Volvo C30SpecificationNissan AD
4266 mmLength4395 mm
1782 mmWidth1695 mm
1447 mmHeight1500 mm
1354 KgWeight1140 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2010 Volvo C30 and 2010 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…