DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Nissan AD vs 2006 Volvo V50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V50
NissanMakeVolvo
ADModelV50
2006Model year2006
EstateBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V50
11,7 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
180 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
124 HPPower109 HP
173 NmTorque240 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V50
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank52 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption5,7 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption3,8 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption4,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V50
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationVolvo V50
4395 mmLength4522 mm
1695 mmWidth1845 mm
1500 mmHeight1457 mm
1140 KgWeight1416 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Nissan AD and 2006 Volvo V50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…