DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2005 MG ZS vs 2006 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

56.5–57.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZSSpecificationNissan AD
MGMakeNissan
ZSModelAD
2005Model year2006
SedanBody typeEstate
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

MG ZSSpecificationNissan AD
9,0 s0–100 km/h11,7 s
19 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1795 ccEngine displacement1769 cc
117 HPPower124 HP
160 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZSSpecificationNissan AD
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank41 lt
9,7 ltUrban consumption10,5 lt
5,8 ltExtra-urban consumption7,3 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption8,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZSSpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/45 R17Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

MG ZSSpecificationNissan AD
4520 mmLength4395 mm
1700 mmWidth1695 mm
1390 mmHeight1500 mm
1125 KgWeight1140 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2005 MG ZS and 2006 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…