DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2006 Nissan AD vs 2005 MG ZS Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

57.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationMG ZS
NissanMakeMG
ADModelZS
2006Model year2005
EstateBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationMG ZS
11,7 s0–100 km/h9,0 s
180 km/hTop speed19 km/h
1769 ccEngine displacement1795 cc
124 HPPower117 HP
173 NmTorque160 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationMG ZS
PetrolFuel typePetrol
41 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,5 ltUrban consumption9,7 lt
7,3 ltExtra-urban consumption5,8 lt
8,6 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationMG ZS
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size205/45 R17
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationMG ZS
4395 mmLength4520 mm
1695 mmWidth1700 mm
1500 mmHeight1390 mm
1140 KgWeight1125 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2006 Nissan AD and 2005 MG ZS approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…