DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Nissan AD vs 2015 Ford C-Max Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationFord C-Max
NissanMakeFord
ADModelC-Max
2015Model year2015
EstateBody typeMPV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationFord C-Max
—0–100 km/h12,1 s
0 km/hTop speed184 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1500 cc
109 HPPower105 HP
148 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationFord C-Max
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank53 lt
—Urban consumption4,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,5 lt
—Average consumption3,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationFord C-Max
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears6
—Tyre size205/55 R16; 215/55 R16; 215/50 R17; 235/40 R18
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationFord C-Max
4395 mmLength4379 mm
1695 mmWidth1828 mm
1500 mmHeight1626 mm
—Weight1330 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Nissan AD and 2015 Ford C-Max approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…