DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Ford C-Max vs 2015 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Ford C-Max

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
FordMakeNissan
C-MaxModelAD
2015Model year2015
MPVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
12,1 s0–100 km/h—
184 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1500 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
105 HPPower109 HP
270 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
DieselFuel typePetrol
53 ltFuel tank41 lt
4,3 ltUrban consumption—
3,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
205/55 R16; 215/55 R16; 215/50 R17; 235/40 R18Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Ford C-MaxSpecificationNissan AD
4379 mmLength4395 mm
1828 mmWidth1695 mm
1626 mmHeight1500 mm
1330 KgWeight—
—Wheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Ford C-Max and 2015 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Ford C-Max leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…