DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Nissan AD vs 2002 Audi A3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.5–56.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi A3
NissanMakeAudi
ADModelA3
2002Model year2002
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi A3
—0–100 km/h10,9 s
0 km/hTop speed189 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1595 cc
100 HPPower102 HP
132 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi A3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,3 lt
—Average consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi A3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
—Tyre size195/65 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationAudi A3
4370 mmLength4152 mm
1695 mmWidth1735 mm
1475 mmHeight1427 mm
—Weight1090 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2513 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Nissan AD and 2002 Audi A3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…