DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2002 Audi A3 vs 2002 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan AD

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

56.25–56.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Audi A3SpecificationNissan AD
AudiMakeNissan
A3ModelAD
2002Model year2002
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

Audi A3SpecificationNissan AD
10,9 s0–100 km/h—
189 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1595 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
102 HPPower100 HP
148 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Audi A3SpecificationNissan AD
PetrolFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,6 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,8 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Audi A3SpecificationNissan AD
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
195/65 R15Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

Audi A3SpecificationNissan AD
4152 mmLength4370 mm
1735 mmWidth1695 mm
1427 mmHeight1475 mm
1090 KgWeight—
2513 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2002 Audi A3 and 2002 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan AD leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…