DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Nissan AD vs 2003 Citroen C3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Citroen C3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

52.5–53.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
NissanMakeCitroen
ADModelC3
2003Model year2003
EstateBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
—0–100 km/h12,9 s
0 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1295 ccEngine displacement1398 cc
87 HPPower90 HP
113 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank45 lt
—Urban consumption5,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption3,7 lt
—Average consumption4,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
—Tyre size185/60 R15
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Nissan ADSpecificationCitroen C3
4370 mmLength3850 mm
1695 mmWidth1667 mm
1475 mmHeight1529 mm
1120 KgWeight1072 Kg
2535 mmWheelbase2460 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Nissan AD and 2003 Citroen C3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Citroen C3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…