DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2004 Lancia Musa vs 2003 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Lancia Musa

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

53.25–52.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

LanciaMakeNissan
MusaModelAD
2004Model year2003
MPVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h—
173 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1248 ccEngine displacement1295 cc
90 HPPower87 HP
200 NmTorque113 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
47 ltFuel tank50 lt
6,3 ltUrban consumption—
4,1 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,9 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
195/60 R15Tyre size—

Dimensions

3985 mmLength4370 mm
1698 mmWidth1695 mm
1688 mmHeight1475 mm
1200 KgWeight1120 Kg
2508 mmWheelbase2535 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2004 Lancia Musa and 2003 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Lancia Musa leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…