2017 • Nissan
370Z
Nissan 370Z 3.7 V6 (328 Hp) 2017Overall Score84.5/100
2017 Nissan 370Z vs 2017 Ford Expedition Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Ford
Expedition
Ford Expedition 3.5 EcoBoost V6 (375 Hp) 2017Overall Score83.75/100
WINNER
Nissan 370Z
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
84.5–83.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan 370ZSpecificationFord Expedition
NissanMakeFord
370ZModelExpedition
2017Model year2017
CoupeBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats8
2Doors5
Performance
Nissan 370ZSpecificationFord Expedition
5,3 s0–100 km/h—
250 km/hTop speed0 km/h
3696 ccEngine displacement3496 cc
328 HPPower375 HP
363 NmTorque637 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan 370ZSpecificationFord Expedition
PetrolFuel typePetrol
72 ltFuel tank88 lt
15,4 ltUrban consumption13,8 lt
7,8 ltExtra-urban consumption10,2 lt
10,6 ltAverage consumption12,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Nissan 370ZSpecificationFord Expedition
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
6Gears10 SelectShift
225/50 R18; 245/45 R18; 245/40 R19; 275/35 R19Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Nissan 370ZSpecificationFord Expedition
4250 mmLength5334 mm
1845 mmWidth2029 mm
1310 mmHeight1941 mm
1421-1451 KgWeight2582 Kg
2550 mmWheelbase3112 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Nissan 370Z and 2017 Ford Expedition approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan 370Z leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…