2017 • Ford
Flex
Ford Flex 3.5 V6 (364 Hp) 2017Overall Score83.75/100
2017 Ford Flex vs 2017 Nissan 370Z Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Nissan
370Z
Nissan 370Z 3.7 V6 (328 Hp) 2017Overall Score84.5/100
WINNER
Nissan 370Z
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
83.75–84.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FlexSpecificationNissan 370Z
FordMakeNissan
FlexModel370Z
2017Model year2017
SUVBody typeCoupe
6-7Seats2
5Doors2
Performance
Ford FlexSpecificationNissan 370Z
—0–100 km/h5,3 s
0 km/hTop speed250 km/h
3496 ccEngine displacement3696 cc
364 HPPower328 HP
475 NmTorque363 Nm
6Cylinders6
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FlexSpecificationNissan 370Z
PetrolFuel typePetrol
71 ltFuel tank72 lt
14,7 ltUrban consumption15,4 lt
10,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,8 lt
13,1 ltAverage consumption10,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FlexSpecificationNissan 370Z
4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
235/60 R17Tyre size225/50 R18; 245/45 R18; 245/40 R19; 275/35 R19
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FlexSpecificationNissan 370Z
5130 mmLength4250 mm
1930 mmWidth1845 mm
1727 mmHeight1310 mm
—Weight1421-1451 Kg
2995 mmWheelbase2550 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Ford Flex and 2017 Nissan 370Z approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Nissan 370Z leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…