DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Skoda Fabia vs 2017 Mitsubishi Xpander Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Skoda Fabia

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SkodaMakeMitsubishi
FabiaModelXpander
2017Model year2017
HatchbackBody typeMPV
5Seats7
5Doors5

Performance

10,1 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1422 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
105 HPPower105 HP
250 NmTorque141 Nm
3Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank45 lt
3,9 ltUrban consumption—
3,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
3,5 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R15Tyre size185/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3992 mmLength4475 mm
1732 mmWidth1750 mm
1467 mmHeight1695 mm
1165 KgWeight1780 Kg
2470 mmWheelbase2775 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Skoda Fabia and 2017 Mitsubishi Xpander approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Skoda Fabia leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…