DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2017 Mitsubishi Triton vs 2017 Nissan Rogue Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Nissan Rogue

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

69.75–70.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeNissan
TritonModelRogue
2017Model year2017
Pick-upBody typeSUV, Crossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
136 HPPower170 HP
324 NmTorque237 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption9,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,1 lt
—Average consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5GearsXtronic
245/70 R16Tyre size225/65 R17; 225/60 R18; 225/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5280 mmLength4686 mm
1815 mmWidth1839 mm
1780 mmHeight1727 mm
1820 KgWeight1567-1606 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2705 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2017 Mitsubishi Triton and 2017 Nissan Rogue approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Nissan Rogue leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…