2017 • Ford
Ranger
Ford Ranger 2.5 (166 Hp) 2017Overall Score70.5/100
2017 Ford Ranger vs 2017 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2017 • Mitsubishi
Triton
Mitsubishi Triton 2.5 DI-D (136 Hp) 2017Overall Score69.75/100
WINNER
Ford Ranger
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
70.5–69.75
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
FordMakeMitsubishi
RangerModelTriton
2017Model year2017
Pick-upBody typePick-up
2Seats5
2Doors4
Performance
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
0 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2499 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
166 HPPower136 HP
226 NmTorque324 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
215/70 R16; 255/70 R16; 265/65 R17; 265/60 R18Tyre size245/70 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford RangerSpecificationMitsubishi Triton
5277-5354 mmLength5280 mm
1860 mmWidth1815 mm
1703 mmHeight1780 mm
1670 KgWeight1820 Kg
3220 mmWheelbase3000 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2017 Ford Ranger and 2017 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Ford Ranger leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…