DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Mitsubishi Triton vs 2015 Subaru Forester Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

67.5–68.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeSubaru
TritonModelForester
2015Model year2015
Pick-upBody typeCrossover
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,9 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
2477 ccEngine displacement2498 cc
110 HPPower175 HP
200 NmTorque235 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
75 ltFuel tank60 lt
—Urban consumption10,9 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
—Average consumption8,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears—
—Tyre size225/60 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

5200 mmLength4595 mm
1785 mmWidth1795 mm
1655 mmHeight1735 mm
1590 KgWeight1513 Kg
3000 mmWheelbase2640 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Mitsubishi Triton and 2015 Subaru Forester approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…