DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2015 Subaru Forester vs 2015 Mitsubishi Triton Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Subaru Forester

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

68.25–67.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMitsubishi
ForesterModelTriton
2015Model year2015
CrossoverBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

9,9 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2498 ccEngine displacement2477 cc
175 HPPower110 HP
235 NmTorque200 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank75 lt
10,9 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,2 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
—Gears5
225/60 R17Tyre size—
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4595 mmLength5200 mm
1795 mmWidth1785 mm
1735 mmHeight1655 mm
1513 KgWeight1590 Kg
2640 mmWheelbase3000 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2015 Subaru Forester and 2015 Mitsubishi Triton approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Subaru Forester leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…