DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Mazda 626 vs 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda 626

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeMitsubishi
626ModelSpace Runner
1997Model year1997
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

12,6 s0–100 km/h17,8 s
180 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1840 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
90 HPPower82 HP
145 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
64 ltFuel tank55 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
—Average consumption7,0 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/65 R15Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4574 mmLength4270 mm
1710 mmWidth1695 mm
1430 mmHeight1665 mm
1180 KgWeight1260 Kg
2610 mmWheelbase2520 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Mazda 626 and 1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda 626 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…