DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1997 Rover Maestro Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover Maestro

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRover
Space RunnerModelMaestro
1997Model year1997
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

17,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
155 km/hTop speed167 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
82 HPPower86 HP
172 NmTorque132 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption8,9 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/55 R15 86 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4000 mm
1695 mmWidth1690 mm
1665 mmHeight1430 mm
1260 KgWeight975 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2510 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1997 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1997 Rover Maestro approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover Maestro leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…