DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1992 Renault Clio Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault Clio

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
Space RunnerModelClio
1992Model year1992
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

17,8 s0–100 km/h14,8 s
155 km/hTop speed161 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1870 cc
82 HPPower64 HP
172 NmTorque118 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
55 ltFuel tank43 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption6,2 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption4,8 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption5,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size155/70 R13 T
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength3709 mm
1695 mmWidth1616 mm
1665 mmHeight1395 mm
1260 KgWeight920 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2472 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1992 Renault Clio approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault Clio leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…