1992 • Opel
Omega
Opel Omega 1.8 (88 Hp) 1992Overall Score46.25/100
1992 Opel Omega vs 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1992 • Mitsubishi
Space Runner
Mitsubishi Space Runner 2.0 TD GLX (82 Hp) 1992Overall Score45.25/100
WINNER
Opel Omega
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
46.25–45.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Opel OmegaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
OpelMakeMitsubishi
OmegaModelSpace Runner
1992Model year1992
SedanBody typeMinivan
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Opel OmegaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
14,0 s0–100 km/h17,8 s
183 km/hTop speed155 km/h
1796 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
88 HPPower82 HP
143 NmTorque172 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Opel OmegaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
75 ltFuel tank55 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
5,6 ltExtra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,1 ltAverage consumption7,0 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Opel OmegaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Opel OmegaSpecificationMitsubishi Space Runner
4740 mmLength4270 mm
1760 mmWidth1695 mm
1445 mmHeight1665 mm
1215 KgWeight1260 Kg
2730 mmWheelbase2520 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1992 Opel Omega and 1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Opel Omega leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…