DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1992 Renault 19 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Renault 19

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRenault
Space RunnerModel19
1992Model year1992
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

17,8 s0–100 km/h12,3 s
155 km/hTop speed171 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1721 cc
82 HPPower73 HP
172 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank55 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
7,0 ltAverage consumption7,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size165/70 R13 T
YesABS—

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4162 mm
1695 mmWidth1696 mm
1665 mmHeight1412 mm
1260 KgWeight970 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2544 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1992 Renault 19 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Renault 19 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…