DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner vs 1992 Opel Astra Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Opel Astra

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

45.25–46.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeOpel
Space RunnerModelAstra
1992Model year1992
MinivanBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors3/5

Performance

17,8 s0–100 km/h14,0 s
155 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
82 HPPower75 HP
172 NmTorque125 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank52 lt
8,0 ltUrban consumption9,2 lt
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption5,3 lt
7,0 ltAverage consumption6,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R13 82T; 175/65 R14 81S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4270 mmLength4051 mm
1695 mmWidth1688 mm
1665 mmHeight1410 mm
1260 KgWeight990/1010 Kg
2520 mmWheelbase2517 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

1992 Mitsubishi Space Runner and 1992 Opel Astra approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Opel Astra leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…